Legal Opinion
Carbonneau v. Hoosier Engineering Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 6, 1950No. 3905PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
Ruth W. Carbonneau, as dependent wife of Albert F. Carbonneau and as mother and joint guardian by statute of their minor children, has no present legal or equitable right or title against which the defendants claim adversely. Her rights in those capacities *242would arise only upon the decease of her husband. Laws 1947, c. 266, ss. 2 VII, 20. Unless therefore Albert F. Carbonneau is a party to this petition, so that his rights will be determined or foreclosed conclusively by any judgment or decree thereon, the petition must be dismissed. Faulkner v. Keene, 85 N. H. 147, 150.
Ruth, however, also…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Hawkins v. BleaklySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Stanley v. Cryer Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Developmental Disabilities Advocacy Center, Inc. v. MeltonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Archie v. HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
- Park v. Rockwell International Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.