Legal Opinion
Southern California Painters & Allied Trades, District Council No. 36 v. Rodin & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 10, 2009No. 06-56246PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYBEE, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Southern California Painters & Allied Trades, District Council No. 36 (“the Union”) brought suit, alleging that defendants-appellees Rodin & Co., Inc. (“Rodin”) and Southern California Painting, Inc. (“SCP”) were alter egos, and that Rodin was therefore bound by the Master Labor Agreement signed by SCP. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court’s judgment in favor of Rodin and SCP.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts
Rodin is a commercial painting contractor in Los Angeles. It has been in busi ness for over eighteen years, employs more than seventy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- UA Local 343 of the United Ass'n v. Nor-Cal Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- gator.com Corp. v. L.L. Bean, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Foster v. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Center for Biological Diversity v. LohnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Van Asdale v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Richard Chen v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Lippert Tile Co. v. International Union of Bricklayers & Allied CraftsmenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Lopez v. Regents of UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.