Legal Opinion
Application of Lurelle Guild
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 29, 1953No. Patent Appeal 5967PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Judge.
The subject matter involved in this appeal relates to a design patent application for a building roof.
In proceedings before the Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office, the single claim of the application was rejected, three grounds therefor being assigned. The Board of Appeals affirmed the examiner’s decision, reversal of the first ground of rejection, however, specifically being manifested.
The claim reads as follows:
“The ornamental design for a building roof substantially as shown and described.”
With the consent of the Patent Office, the application drawing has been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cohn v. United States Corset Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Application of McKennaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- In Re MardenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- In re DeckerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1910
- In re CrosbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
3Cited by12 opinions
- Thabet Manufacturing Company, D.B.A. American Beauty Ventilated Aluminum Awning Company v. Kool Vent Metal Awning Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- In re ReuterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- In re ReuterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- In re YardleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Aileen Mills Co. v. Ojay Mills, IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.