Legal Opinion

Aileen Mills Co. v. Ojay Mills, Incorporated

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 24, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVET, District Judge.

Defendants moved for summary judgment to dismiss the cause of action for alleged patent infringement of plaintiffs’ Design Patent No. 181,148, covering a textile fabric or similar article. Defendants claim that the bedspreads manufactured and sold by them do not infringe upon the design of the fabric illustrated and claimed in the patent in suit. This is a non-jury case.

The defendants’ contentions are essentially as follows:(1) The fabric illustrated in the patent drawings or print of the swatch submitted by the applicant (plaintiffs here) consists of a series of cut…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Xerox Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  2. Horwitt v. Longines Wittnauer Watch Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  3. Eastern Electric, Inc. v. Seeburg CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  4. C-Thru Products, Inc. v. Uniflex, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1966
  5. Ames Shower Curtain Co. v. Heinz Nathanson, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API