Legal Opinion

In Re Marden

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 31, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2633PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 31 to 46, inclusive, in appellants’ application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to a “mass of thorium, which -is substantially pure, coherent and homogeneous,” wire, filaments, and electrodes formed of ductile thorium.

Claims 32, 38, 42, and 46 are illustrative. They read:

“32. A mass of thorium which is substantially, pure, coherent and homogeneous.”
“38. A wire formed of ductile thorium.”
“42. A filament of ductile thorium.”
“46. An…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cohn v. United States Corset Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. General Electric Co. v. De Forest Radio Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  3. In Re MardenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. In Re MardenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Application of Edward Burton LegriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. In Re Von BramerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  3. Application of KebrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  4. In Re StollCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  5. Application of Lurelle GuildCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API