Legal Opinion
State v. Pikul
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 4, 1962PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.
The defendant was convicted on a charge of conspiracy to obtain money by false pretenses. He has appealed. The state’s attorney, in the information, charged that Leon Cohen, George Kania, Melvin Muravnick, LeRoy Hendricks, William Colangelo, John Kozakiewich, Gillis Lemieux and the defendant conspired with one another to obtain money by false pretenses, in violation of § 53-360 of the General Statutes, and that one or more of the conspirators did certain acts (described in a bill of particulars) in furtherance of the conspiracy, in violation of § 54-197 of the General Statutes. In this…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- United States v. TonerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- State v. FalbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.