Legal Opinion
E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 8, 2002No. 99-101 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
TURNER, Senior Judge.
Plaintiff alleges that defendant breached the terms of Contract No. W-ORD-490 when it refused to reimburse and/or indemnify plaintiff for costs plaintiff incurred pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) at the Morgantown Ordnance Works (MOW), an ordnance plant plaintiff built and operated for the United States during World War II (WWII). The case stands on cross-motions for summary judgment.
I
In 1940, the United States entered into Contract No. W-ORD-490 with plaintiff to construct and operate a chemical…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Stuyvesant Dredging Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Shell Oil Company v. the United States 06-141c & 0United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- RCS Enterprises v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Lublin Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Robertson Fire Protection District v. MinerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025