Legal Opinion
Guild v. Hinman
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 29, 1997PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANA, Justice.
[¶ 1] James Hinman appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J.) after a nonju-ry trial concluding that the scope of Hin-man’s right of way over Patricia Morrison Guild’s property does not include the right to install utility lines. Hinman contends the court erred when it found that the parties to the original conveyance creating the right of way did not contemplate that the property would be used for residential purposes. We affirm the judgment.
[¶ 2] Guild owns land abutting the Lambert Road in Freeport. Except for the cleared land…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. BrukSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Saltonstall v. CummingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Fine Line, Inc. v. BlakeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Drummond v. FosterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
- Infinity Broadcasting Corp. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Flaherty v. MutherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Arcidi v. Town of RyeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Crispin v. Town of ScarboroughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Anchors v. ManterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.