Legal Opinion

Saltonstall v. Cumming

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 8, 1988PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Stella and David Salton-stall, appeal from a summary judgment on Count II of their complaint entered by the Superior Court, Hancock County, in favor of the defendants, Robert and Jean Cumming. The Saltonstalls contend that the court erred by concluding that a deed granting them “a right-of-way for all purposes of a way” over the Cummings’ property could not, as a matter of law, be interpreted to include the right to install utility lines along the length of the right-of-way. We vacate the summary judgment. 1

A party seeking summary judgment pursuant to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matheson v. Bangor Publishing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Ware v. Public Service Co. of New HampshireSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Cleaves v. BramanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
  4. Pelletier v. Mellon Bank, N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. State v. ColburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Polley v. AtwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  2. Bahre v. PearlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  3. Gary Sleeper v. Donald R. LoringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  4. Fine Line, Inc. v. BlakeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Chase v. EastmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API