Legal Opinion
Parsons v. Eisele
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 31, 1928No. 18238PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIFFENDAFFER, C.
This is an action in replevin for the recovery of the possession of an automobile of the alleged value of $900, and for damages for the wrongful detention thereof. The petition and affidavit were in the usual form, the allegations of damages in the sum of $100 being general. The automobile here in controversy is described as “one five-passenger second-hand Packard touring automobile.” A writ of replevin was issued on June 14, 1926, and returned “Not found” on June 16, 1926. On June 06th, an alias writ was issued and serv'ed on June 28th. Defendant made a redelivery bond, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Avery v. Jayhawker Gasoline Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- First State Bank of Mannsville v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Weleetka Light & Water Co. v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tax/Investments Concepts, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. ChaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Monarch Refineries, Inc. v. Union Tank Car Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Anthony v. Sapulpa Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Murdock Motor Corp. v. KirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.