Legal Opinion

Fort Worth Stock Yards Co. v. Whittenburg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 2, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. M. E. Smith.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

Appellee recovered a judgment against the appellant company for the sum of $1000 as damages for personal injuries caused by the fall of an overhanging bank of earth at a sandpit to which appellee had gone for the purpose of getting a load of sand. Among other things appellant pleaded assumed risk on appellee’s part, in that the danger was “as open and apparent to the appellee as to the appellant, and that the appellee, in undertaking to work in and about the sand bank, assumed the risk of its caving or falling in on him.”

Error is first assigned to the action of the court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. G., H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. LempeTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Larich v. MoiesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1894
  4. Smith v. RidleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Turner v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. City of Austin v. GressCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. DrennanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. HemphillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. City of Munday v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API