Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ridley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Hunt County. Tried below before Hon. H. C. Connor.

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Chief Justice.

This is an action of trespass to try title brought by appellants against appellee. Judgment was rendered for appellee and appellants prosecute this appeal. There is no material conflict in the testimony, and we conclude that the evidence is sufficient to support the judgment.

The rights of the parties depend upon the validity of the following judgment, and sale of the land in controversy thereunder, viz:

“J. C. O’Neal v. Tom G. Smith, S. Z. Smith. No. 64. Justice Court, Precinct No. 4, Hunt County, Texas.. “Suit pending in justice court, precinct No. 4, Hunt County, Texas,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. BallTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Chestnutt v. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Flanagan v. BrunerTexas Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hudson v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Fort Worth Stock Yards Co. v. WhittenburgCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Akin v. First Nat. Bank of BridgeportCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Love v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Wilson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API