Legal Opinion
Pedraza v. United Guaranty Corp.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided April 25, 2000No. CIV. A. 199-239PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALAIMO, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this suit under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RES-PA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq. She, along with the members of her class, purchased mortgage insurance from United Guaranty Corporation (“UGC”), Defendant, in connection with the financing of their home purchases. The sale of mortgage insurance, in itself, does not violate RESPA or any other federal statute. Plaintiffs complaint, however, alleges that Defendant sold its mortgage insurance product to her and the members of the class by means of a kickback scheme. Under this scheme…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Alston v. Countrywide Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Egerer v. Woodland Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Proctor v. Metropolitan Money Store Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- In Re CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Mullinax v. Radian Guaranty Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.