Legal Opinion
Mullinax v. Radian Guaranty Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided January 25, 2002No. 1:00CV01247PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BEATY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss [Document # 9] by Defendants Radian Guaranty Inc. and Amerin Guaranty Corporation (together “Radian” or “Defendants”). Against these Defendants, Plaintiffs Richard C. Mulli- nax, Jr. (“Mullinax”) and Perry Pike (“Pike”) (together “Plaintiffs”) 1 allege violations of Section 8 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2607. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in Part and DENIED in part. Furthermore, Plaintiffs are granted LEAVE TO AMEND…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In Re Community Bank of Northern VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Egerer v. Woodland Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Proctor v. Metropolitan Money Store Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Marie O. Pedraza v. United Guaranty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Stack v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.