Demary v. Royal Indemnity Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DORE, Judge.
The issues in the case are fully stated' in the original opinion. 182 So. 389. All. defenses have been abandoned, except the fourth, relative to the failure of the insured', to have two custodians on duty at the time of the robbery. The application for a rehearing was granted and the case is. now before us on the rehearing in order to give further consideration to this ques-tion alone.
In Paragraph III of the policy the defendant insurance company agreed to indemnify the plaintiff (the insured) against loss or damage to any money or securities ■occasioned by robbery, or attempt…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. H. Kobacker & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- H. & S. Pogue Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- McGannon v. Millers' National InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Axe v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Goldstein v. Royal Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 70th St. Food Store, Inc. v. NORTHEASTERN FIRE INS. CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981