Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Royal Indemnity Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 29, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract upon a policy insuring the plaintiff against robbery in premises located on Southbridge Street, Worcester, Massachusetts, wherein the plaintiff conducted a meat and grocery store. To the plaintiff’s declaration the defendant pleaded a general denial and a violation of the terms of the policy.

In substance, the evidence contained in the bill of exceptions warranted a finding of the following facts: On July 28, 1932, at about 7 a.m. the plaintiff’s store manager, alone, arrived on the premises and opened the store. A few minutes later a man entered the store, gave…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Everson v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Faris v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Charles, Henry & Crowley Co. Inc. v. Home Ins. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Terrasi v. PeirceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Bolta Rubber Co. v. Lowell Trucking Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  5. Demary v. Royal Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API