Legal Opinion

H. & S. Pogue Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1924No. 3967PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Circuit Judge.

This is á writ of error from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action to recover upon a policy of insurance known as “interior office robbery policy.” There is no dispute as to the facts; the question resolves itself into an interpretation of the policy, which, subject to certain general provisions, covers “all loss by robbery of property from within the premises occurring at any time during the hours beginning at 7 a. m. and ending at 12 midnight.” The general provisions, so far as pertinent here, read as follows:

“1. Robbery, within tbe meaning of this policy is…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  2. Boesky Bros. Twelfth Street Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. H. Kobacker & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  4. Goldberg v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Kaplan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API