Legal Opinion
Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. H. Kobacker & Sons Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 15, 1929No. 5103PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
This
was an action at law, brought by the defendant in error to recover upon a policy of burglary insurance. No formal application was made by the insured, but answers to certain questions in the schedule were supplied by the soliciting agent upon his then mistaken understanding of the facts. Such schedule contained inter alia the following :
"Schedule.
"The following statements, No. 1 to 8, inclusive, are hereby made a part of this policy and are warranted by the assured to be true. >
"5 (b) A private watchman employed exclusively by the assured will be on duty within…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Lumber Underwriters of NY v. RifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. NanceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Shamrock Towing Co. v. American Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Home Ins. Co. v. Ciconett. Ciconett v. Home Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Subar v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd. v. Standard Brick & Tile CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.