Legal Opinion

Argentena Consolidated Mining Co. v. Standish

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 2009No. 50282PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, C.J.:

This appeal arises out of a district court’s order adjudicating an attorney-client fee dispute between appellant Argentena Consolidated Mining Company and its former law firm respondent Jolley Urga Wirth Woodbury & Standish. Jolley Urga defended Argentena in the underlying personal injury action between Argentena and an injured plaintiff. In this opinion, we must determine whether, in the absence of an enforceable charging lien or the client’s request or consent to the district court’s adjudication of a retaining lien, and in light of the client’s legal…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brunzell v. Golden Gate National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Kaldi v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Commission on Ethics v. HardyNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Rhoads v. SommerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Stanley v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Schuck v. Signature Flight Support of Nevada, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Armenta-Carpio v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Stubbs v. StricklandNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. BOONSONG JITNAN v. OliverNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Grisham v. GrishamNevada Supreme Court · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API