Legal Opinion

Stubbs v. Strickland

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 2013No. 58751; 59145PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Gibbons, J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether a defendant can file an anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) suit after the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the initial lawsuit. We conclude that if the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the action before the defendant files either an initial responsive pleading or a special motion to dismiss pursuant to NRS 41.670, the defendant cannot file an anti-SLAPP suit against the plaintiff based on that action.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In December 2010, Stephen Stubbs gave a speech during the public comment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Cromer v. WilsonNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Hay v. HayNevada Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Coker v. SassoneNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Adelson v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. STARK VS. LACKEYNevada Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Frederic & Barbara Rosenberg Living Trust v. MacDonald Highlands Realty, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Mackey v. KrauseUtah Supreme Court · 2025

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API