Legal Opinion
Commission on Ethics v. Hardy
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 2009No. 53064PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this appeal, we consider whether appellant Nevada Commission on Ethics has the authority to conduct administrative proceedings regarding alleged ethical violations purportedly committed by respondent Senator Warren B. Hardy n. Specifically, we address the Commission’s authorization to entertain allegations that Senator Hardy violated NRS 281A.420 by failing to adequately disclose an alleged conflict of interest regarding a piece of legislation and by failing to abstain from voting on that bill. In this regard, this appeal sets the very nature of the Commission’s jurisdiction before…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by43 opinions
- Sowers v. Forest Hills SubdivisionNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Argentena Consolidated Mining Co. v. StandishNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Berkson v. LePomeNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Berry v. CrawfordIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District v. Washoe County Board of County CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 2013
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.