Legal Opinion

Jellison v. O'Connell

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 12, 2002No. AC 22715PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The pro se plaintiff, Charles E. Jellison, appeals from the trial court’s judgment of nonsuit rendered against him. On appeal, the plaintiff apparently claims that the court improperly rendered the judgment of nonsuit.

We decline to review the plaintiffs claim because he has failed to provide any legal authority for or analysis of his claim. “[W]e are not required to review claims that are inadequately briefed. . . . We consistently have held that [ajnalysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly.”…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wren v. MacPherson Interiors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Baris v. Southbend, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Knapp v. KnappSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Fantasia v. Milford Fastening SystemsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Lowe v. City of SheltonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Breen v. Synthes-Stratec, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Chuckta v. AsijaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API