Chuckta v. Asija

Opinion

In this matter involving a boundary dispute, the defendants, Satya Pal Asija and Teresa DeJesus Asija, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, David A. Chuckta. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly rejected their claim of adverse possession. 1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history, as set forth by the court in its memorandum of decision, are relevant to the defendant’s appeal. The plaintiff is the owner of property at 86 Coram Road in Shelton, which consists of three lots…