Legal Opinion

Arthur Palardy v. Canadian Universal Insurance Company, and American Universal Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 18, 1966No. 265, Docket 30163PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

This is a suit on a judgment which Palardy, the appellee, had obtained in a prior tort action in the United States District Court for the District of Vermont against the Moulton Ladder Manufacturing Company, which was the insured under a products liability policy of Canadian Universal Insurance Company, the defendant-appellant in the present action. The District Court entered judgment in favor of Palardy and the insurance company appeals.1

Canadian had issued a “Manufacturers and Contractors Liability” policy to Moulton for the year July 1, 1961 to July 1, 1962. Other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PedersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  2. Tucker v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United StatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  3. Ohio Farmers Insurance v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Deodato v. Hartford Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Scott v. KeeverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Coppola v. Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Del Boring Tire Service v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API