Legal Opinion

Del Boring Tire Service v. Federal Emergency Management Agency

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 4, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-593PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZIEGLER, District Judge.

I. History of Case

This is a civil action to recover the proceeds allegedly due under a contract of insurance between plaintiff, Del Boring Tire Service, Inc., (Del Boring) and defendant, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Jurisdiction is predicated on 42 U.S.C. § 4053. Presently before the court are the cross-motions of the parties for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth herein, the motion of defendant will be granted and the motion of Del Boring will be denied.

The stipulation of facts submitted by the parties establishes the following. Del…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Arthur Palardy v. Canadian Universal Insurance Company, and American Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  3. Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Quesada v. Director, Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1983
  2. Scott v. Southwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Dempsey v. Director, Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1982
  4. Coppola v. Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Continental Imports, Inc. v. MacYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API