Legal Opinion
Ohio Farmers Insurance v. Hunter
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 1906No. 5,431PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Erom Jefferson Circuit Court; Hiram, Francisco, Judge. Action by Diantha Hunter against the Ohio Farmers Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRoby, C. J.
Action on a policy of fire insurance. The plaintiff had verdict and judgment for $597.50. The complaint is in two paragraphs. They are not challenged by demurrer, and, while the second paragraph is attached by assignment of error, no argument in support thereof is made. We do not approve the pleading by inference or otherwise. An answer in three paragraphs was filed, in the second of which it was averred that the policy sued upon contained a provision as follows:
“This policy may he canceled at any time, and if canceled by the insured and the premium has been actually paid in cash the company…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crown Point Iron Co. v. Ætna InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Train v. . Holland Purchase Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Insurance Commissioner v. People's Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
- Stewart v. Knight & Jillson Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Ikeller v. Hartford Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arthur Palardy v. Canadian Universal Insurance Company, and American Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. StoughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Conway Bros. v. Iowa Hardware Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Arthur Palardy v. Canadian Universal Insurance Company, and American Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Continental Insurance v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916