Legal Opinion
Deodato v. Hartford Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 28, 1976PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
143 N.J. Super. 396 (1976)
363 A.2d 361
JOHN DEODATO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided June 28, 1976.
Mr. Peter Peletz, Jr. for plaintiff (Messr. George J. Sokalski, attorney).
Mr. Victor C. Harwood, III for defendant (Messrs. Harwood, Lloyd, Kelly, Ryan, Coyle & Wulster, attorneys).
ROSENBERG, J.S.C., Retired and Temporarily Assigned on Recall.
These are cross-motions for summary judgment brought by plaintiff John Deodato (Deodato) and defendant Hartford Insurance Company (Hartford). The parties have stipulated to the following…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kievit v. Loyal Protective Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Mazzilli v. Acc. & Cas. Ins. Co. of WinterthurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Danek v. HommerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Danek v. HommerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Memorial Properties, LLC v. Zurich American InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.