Legal Opinion

Cassady v. Hiatt & Lee

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 12, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, J.:

This is an appeal from a final decree enjoining the collection of unemployment contributions for the years 1939-40 under the Florida Unemployment Compensation Law.

The decree was entered on an agreed statement of facts substantially as follows: Appellee was engaged in a business which might be termed grove management; it contracted with grove owners to cultivate and maintain citrus groves; to fulfill its contracts it employed laborers.

The only question is whether: “the term ‘Agricultural Labor,’ as the same is used in the Florida Unemployment Compensation Law prior to July 1, 1941,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sylcord v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Chester C. Fosgate Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  3. Bykle v. District Court of Watonwan CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Florida Industrial Commission v. Growers Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. State v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Thomas Smith Farms, Inc. v. AldaySupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  4. Miranda v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  5. Tison v. HyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API