Cassady v. Hiatt & Lee
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, J.:
This is an appeal from a final decree enjoining the collection of unemployment contributions for the years 1939-40 under the Florida Unemployment Compensation Law.
The decree was entered on an agreed statement of facts substantially as follows: Appellee was engaged in a business which might be termed grove management; it contracted with grove owners to cultivate and maintain citrus groves; to fulfill its contracts it employed laborers.
The only question is whether: “the term ‘Agricultural Labor,’ as the same is used in the Florida Unemployment Compensation Law prior to July 1, 1941,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sylcord v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Chester C. Fosgate Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- Bykle v. District Court of Watonwan CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
3Cited by6 opinions
- Florida Industrial Commission v. Growers Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1943
- State v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Thomas Smith Farms, Inc. v. AldaySupreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Miranda v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Tison v. HyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.