State v. Christensen
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
Four cases are involved in this appeal. Due to the fact that the principal question raised in all' the cases is whether or not certain men employed as milk truck drivers and milkhouse men by the following dairy farms: Richmond Highlands Dairy Farm, Hansen Brothers Dairy, Smithers Farm Dairy, and Riverview Farm, are “agricultural laborers,” as that term is defined in Rem. Supp. 1941, § 9998-119g (6) (i), it was stipulated that the four cases might be consolidated for the purpose of this appeal, and accord ingly an order was entered in this court so consolidating them.
These cases originated in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- H. Duys Co., Inc. v. ToneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Cowiche Growers, Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Keeney v. BeasmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Peterson v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Davis & Co. v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Hines v. WintersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Hall v. Corp. of Catholic ArchbishopWashington Supreme Court · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.