Legal Opinion

Miranda v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 10, 1969No. 38438PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Justice.

The judge of Industrial Claims in this Workmen’s Compensation case found that at the time of the accident claimant was an employee within the meaning and intent of Section 440.02(2) (a), Florida Statutes 1967, F.S.A.,1 and is eligible for benefits under the Act. The focal point here is the decision of the Full Commission that claimant was an agricultural laborer exempted from coverage of the Act by Section 440.-02(1) (c) 3 of the Act.2

At the time of the accident, claimant was a 50-year old Puerto Rican whom the employer had hired on a seasonal basis 18 years earlier to pick…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas Smith Farms, Inc. v. AldaySupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  2. Cassady v. Hiatt & LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  3. Huebner v. Farmers Cooperative Ass'n of HollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keith v. News & Sun Sentinel Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Keil v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Rudolph v. Miami Dolphins, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Miles v. Montreal Baseball ClubDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Stuart v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API