Legal Opinion

Tison v. Hyer

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 3, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.:

The appellant was injured while he was pruning an orange tree and he claimed compensation under “Workmen’s Compensation Law.” F.S.A. Sec. 440.01 et seq. The deputy commissioner ruled in his favor, reciting in the order that “The sole contention of the employers was [that] this man was an independent contractor and not an employee.” When the matter reached the Florida Industrial Commission that body adopted the view that recovery was unwarranted because fruit growing was a form of agriculture and as “agricultural farm labor” was excepted from the operation of the act the Commission…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cassady v. Hiatt & LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas Smith Farms, Inc. v. AldaySupreme Court of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API