Legal Opinion

Peyravy v. Peyravy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 28, 2003No. 97,180PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, J.:

¶ 1 The only issue presented on cer-tiorari 1 is whether the trial court’s award of support alimony is supported by the evidence. We hold that the trial court’s award of support alimony was insufficient and an abuse of discretion.

FACTS

¶ 2 This cause concerns a dispute over the support alimony awarded to the appellant, Juliana Peyravy (wife), in her divorce from the appellee, Ali Peyravy (husband). The couple was married on February 9,1979, and had three children who were born on September 29, 1979, September 26, 1983, and January 4,1985, respectively.

¶ 3 On August 15, 2000, the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hutchings v. HutchingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. METCALF v. METCALFSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. Marriage of Finkenstaedt v. FinkenstaedtCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. Janitz v. JanitzCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. METCALF v. METCALFSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API