Legal Opinion
Ray v. Ray
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 9, 2006No. 101,392PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
¶ 1 The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether the trial court erred in its award of support alimony to the wife. We answer in the affirmative.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
¶ 2 Kenneth Allen Ray (husband) and Lora Gail Ray (wife) were married on 18 June 2002. The parties separated 21 months later and wife filed for divorce on 31 March 2004. No children were born of this union.
¶ 3 The trial court explained that the dissolution proceedings would be conducted as a “quasi summary proceeding” in which counsel would be allowed to ask leading questions. The parties were the only witnesses. No…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Reaves v. ReavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Wylie v. ChesserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- State v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- BOYLE v. ASAP ENERGY, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Mustang Run Wind Project, LLC v. Osage County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.