Downing & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge
The importations which gave rise to the present question consisted of two bales of mercerized cotton yarn.
The bales were invoiced by weight, to wit, 600 pounds each, and at a stated unit price per pound. They were entered for duty at the same weight as that stated in the invoice, but in the entry the importers made certain additions per pound to the price given in the invoice, in order to raise it to the actual market value of the merchandise.
Thereupon the collector classified the yarn for duty under paragraph 250 of the tariff act of 1913. That paragraph imposes certain ad valorem rates of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marriott v. BruneSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Austin v. PeasleeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1857
- United States v. BushCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. NashU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1869
- Weaver & Sterry, Ltd. v. SaltonstallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1889
3Cited by21 opinions
- Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- Gertzen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Ciba Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Pastene & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- United States v. Sandoz Chemical WorksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.