United States v. Sandoz Chemical Works
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
This is an appeal by the Government from a judgment of the Board of General Appraisers sustaining the importer’s protest on a consumption entry.
The only question is whether certain imported coal-tar dyes, •dutiable under paragraph 28 of the Tariff Act of 1922, shall pay the specific duty of 7 cents per pound upon the number of pounds *22actually imported or upon a greater weight ascertained in the manner hereinafter described.
The paragraph provides that the dyes in question shall pay a specific duty of 7 cents per pound.
Provided, That the specific duty of 7 cents per pound herein provided for *…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lawder v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. ShallusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Dunlap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Diana v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Sandoz Chemical WorksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Miles v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Ciba Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Faber, Coe & Gregg (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Roser Customs Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970