Legal Opinion

United States v. Sandoz Chemical Works

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 17, 1926No. 2645PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

This is an appeal by the Government from a judgment of the Board of General Appraisers sustaining the importer’s protest on a consumption entry.

The only question is whether certain imported coal-tar dyes, •dutiable under paragraph 28 of the Tariff Act of 1922, shall pay the specific duty of 7 cents per pound upon the number of pounds *22actually imported or upon a greater weight ascertained in the manner hereinafter described.

The paragraph provides that the dyes in question shall pay a specific duty of 7 cents per pound.

Provided, That the specific duty of 7 cents per pound herein provided for *…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lawder v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. ShallusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Dunlap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  5. Diana v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Sandoz Chemical WorksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Miles v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Ciba Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  4. Faber, Coe & Gregg (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. Roser Customs Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API