Legal Opinion

Ciba Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 14, 1926No. 2769PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

Merchandise, consisting of a coal-tar color, was assessed for duty by the collector at 60 per centum ad valorem and 7 'cents per pound under paragraph 28 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which contains the following provisions:

Par. 28. * * * 45 per centum ad valorem based upon the American selling price (as defined in subdivision (f) of section 402, Title IV) of any similar competitive article manufactured or produced in the United States, and 7 cents per pound: Provided, That for a period of two years beginning on the day following the passage of this act the ad valorem rate of duty shall be 60…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. United States v. Spingarn Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. United States v. Bennett & LoewenthalCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Sonneborn Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Ullman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Pillowcase & Lace Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Jacksonville Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  3. Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. Beaver Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. Eurasia Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API