Legal Opinion

Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 1, 1949No. C. D. 1155PublishedCited by 626 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this suit consists of distilled dry gin imported from Cuba. Duty was assessed at the rate of $2 per gallon of 100 proof under the provisions of paragraph 802 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom, 54 Stat. 1897 (T. D. 49753), wherein the tariff rate was reduced from $5 per proof gallon to $2.50 per proof gallon. Having been imported as a product of Cuba, the trade agreement with Cuba, 49 Stat. 3559 (T. D. 47232), became operative as to the 20 per centum preferential rate granted such products under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marriott v. BruneSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. The United States, in Error v. Horace Southmayd and Stephen C. SouthmaydSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Belcher v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  4. Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  5. Lawrence v. CaswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1852

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by626 opinions

  1. Parrott v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. Josebra Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  4. Continental Distilling Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

621 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API