Legal Opinion
Parker v. Tumwater Family Practice Clinic
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 16, 2003No. 28323-9-IIPublished
1Opinion of the Court
76 P.3d 764 (2003)
118 Wash.App. 425
Michael R. PARKER, Appellant,
v.
TUMWATER FAMILY PRACTICE CLINIC; Sean T. Atteridge and Beverly Atteridge; Ellen Martin and "John Doe" Martin; Jon T. Peterson; and Gapp Associates, Respondents.
No. 28323-9-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
September 16, 2003.
Charles Kenneth Wiggins, Bainbridge Island, WA, for Appellant.
Cecilia Marie Clynch, Stephen Jacob Bean, Olympia, WA, for Respondents.
PART PUBLISHED OPINION
ARMSTRONG, J.
Dr. Michael Parker practiced medicine with three partners. Parker and two of his medical partners also owned the Clinic's…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Eastlake Construction Co. v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Hederman v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Sinnar v. LeRoyWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Walsh v. BrousseauCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.