Legal Opinion

Giordano v. Richitelli, No. 29 68 79 (Sep. 13, 1990)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 13, 1990No. 29 68 79Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE Plaintiffs move to strike defendant's First Special Defense, First Offset and Counterclaim and Second Offset and Counterclaim as legally insufficient and failing to set forth a claim upon which relief can be granted.

II

A motion to strike contests "the legal sufficiency of . . . "any counterclaim" . . . any special defenses" Practice Bk. 152. Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing Authority, 208 Conn. 161, 170. Such motion admits all facts well pleaded but does not admit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
Willie James Nelson v. Edward Hargett, Superintendent, Mississippi State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
Savings Bank of New London v. SantanielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.