Legal Opinion

State v. Roberson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 16, 2010No. 1 CA-CR 09-0066PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOWNIE, Judge.

¶ 1 Paula Ann Roberson (“defendant”) challenges the superior court’s denial of her suppression motion. We affirm and hold that violation of the “knoek-and-announce” rule did not require suppression of evidence obtained pursuant to a valid search warrant for defendant’s home under either the federal or state constitution.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 The Yavapai County Sheriffs Office was investigating defendant for selling drugs. Detective D. prepared a search warrant affidavit that detailed the investigation and the basis for searching defendant’s home. Near the end of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. State v. AultArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. BoltArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. NordstromArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  2. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOELLE D. CARONNA STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. FREDDY COLLADO (20-02-0221, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API