Legal Opinion
State v. Bolt
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 1984No. 6139-PRPublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Justice.
Walter Thomas Bolt (defendant) was convicted by a jury of sale of marijuana, unlawful possession of marijuana and conspiracy. The court of appeals affirmed. State v. Bolt, 141 Ariz. 284, 689 P.2d 543 (App.1983). Defendant raised four issues before the court of appeals but only' a single issue was raised in the petition for review filed in this court:
Did the court of appeals err when it affirmed the trial court’s refusal to suppress evidence that was seized from the defendant’s house pursuant to a warrant when, absent exigent circumstances, the police had entered and “secured”…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- State v. NovembrinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. DavoltArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- Cobb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.