Brinsfield v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Seminole county of having the unlawful possession of a still and was sentenced to serve a term of 90 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $200.
Several assignments of error are argued: First, that chapter 42, Second Session of the Ninth Legislature, Session Laws 1923-24, the act under which the prosecution is based, is unconstitutional for the reason that the title of said act embraces more than one subject in violation of article 5, § 57, of the Constitution, which provides that every act of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Penney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Kemp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Merck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Cummings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blackford v. Judith Basin CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1940