Legal Opinion

Brinsfield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 5, 1927No. A-6098PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Seminole county of having the unlawful possession of a still and was sentenced to serve a term of 90 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $200.

Several assignments of error are argued: First, that chapter 42, Second Session of the Ninth Legislature, Session Laws 1923-24, the act under which the prosecution is based, is unconstitutional for the reason that the title of said act embraces more than one subject in violation of article 5, § 57, of the Constitution, which provides that every act of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Penney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Kemp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Merck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Cummings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blackford v. Judith Basin CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API