Legal Opinion
Kemp v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided July 31, 1926No. A-5610PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was charged in the county court of Oklahoma county with having possession of a still. Upon arraignment, he was informed by the county court of his right to have 24 hours to plead, and to have counsel, and of the consequences of his plea. He informed the court that he did not desire counsel, nor time to plead, and entered his plea of guilty. The court set the following day for passing sentence.
On the following day defendant appeared with counsel, asked to withdraw his plea of guilty, and to enter a plea of not guilty. After considerable…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
- Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
- In Re Menefee, State TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- In Re PowellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gilbert Central Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Fent v. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- Daugherty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.