Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 19, 1975No. 73-1162PublishedCited by 295 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger

We granted certiorari to decide whether a district court may impose summary contempt punishment under Fed. Rule Crim. Proc. 42 (a)1 when a witness who has been granted immunity, refuses on Fifth Amendment grounds to testify. The Court of Appeals held that in such circumstances a judge cannot dispose of the contempt summarily, but must proceed under Rule 42 (b),2 *311which calls for disposition only after notice and hearing, and “a reasonable time for the preparation of the defense.”

I

Respondents Wilson and Bryan, along with one Robert Anderson, were charged in separate indictments with separate…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by295 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. Larry FlyntCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

290 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API