United States v. Wilson
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger
We granted certiorari to decide whether a district court may impose summary contempt punishment under Fed. Rule Crim. Proc. 42 (a)1 when a witness who has been granted immunity, refuses on Fifth Amendment grounds to testify. The Court of Appeals held that in such circumstances a judge cannot dispose of the contempt summarily, but must proceed under Rule 42 (b),2 *311which calls for disposition only after notice and hearing, and “a reasonable time for the preparation of the defense.”
I
Respondents Wilson and Bryan, along with one Robert Anderson, were charged in separate indictments with separate…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by295 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Larry FlyntCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
290 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.