Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Beazer East, Inc., Unpublished Decision (12-21-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2006No. Nos. 86635 87897UnpublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGEMENT: REVERSED AND REMANDED {¶ 1} In this consolidated appeal, Wenton and Marie Hutchinson ("the Hutchinsons"), appeal the trial court's decision granting judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Tasco Insulation, Inc. ("Tasco"). Finding merit to the appeal, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

{¶ 2} In 2001, the Hutchinsons filed suit against Tasco and numerous defendants alleging that the use of asbestos-containing materials caused Wenton Hutchinson to develop cancer. ("Hutchinson I"). Tasco moved for summary judgment, alleging that the Hutchinsons failed to identify that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Denham v. City of New CarlisleOhio Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Knoop v. Orthopaedic Consultants of Cincinnati, Ca2007-10-101 (8-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Davis v. Dungeons of DelhiOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Faraj v. QasemOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Jessica v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. Collins v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API