Legal Opinion

Denham v. City of New Carlisle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1999No. 98-1935PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyek, C.J.

The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether a decision of a trial court granting summary judgment based on immunity for one of several defendants in a civil action becomes a final appealable order when the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the remaining parties to the suit pursuant to Civ.R. 41(A)(1). This is a case of first impression before this court.

Plaintiff-appellant Denham argues that the trial court decision granting summary judgment to New Carlisle is a final appealable order, as all the remaining parties have been dismissed and the summary judgment order for New Carlisle…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Clayton Coffey v. Foamex L.P., and Recticel Foam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. General Electric Supply Co. v. Warden Electric, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Terry v. PearlmanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1967

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Denham v. New CarlisleOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Pattison v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Soler v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. City of Riverside v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API