State v. Kelso
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judges.
Virgil Kelso appeals his conviction and sentence for first-degree child molestation based on his act of having the victim (a child less than fourteen years of age) place a condom on Kelso’s penis. Kelso claims that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict finding him guilty in that the State alleged, but failed to prove, that Kelso caused the victim’s hand to touch his genitals “through the clothing” insofar as a condom does not constitute “clothing.” Because the State was not required to prove the existence of clothing in order to establish…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RichieHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Thomas A. EssSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- State v. CarltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Robert Frantz v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. ClearyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. JAMES DARRIN WOOLARDMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.