Legal Opinion

State v. Cleary

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 2013No. SD 32006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, P.J.,

Opinion Author.

Appellant was charged with one count of statutory sodomy “on or about between June 1, 2009 and August 19, 2009.” Jury instructions at his trial used similar language.

In closing argument, defense counsel claimed the state had to prove the crime occurred “between” those stated dates. When the prosecutor told jurors differently in rebuttal, the defense objected, asserting that time was an “element of the crime,” and moved for a mistrial which the *547court denied. The jury found Appellant guilty.

Appellant challenges this refusal to grant a mistrial, “a drastic…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. State v. Celis-GarciaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. State v. ArmsteadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. State v. SextonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. CarneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haywood v. RameyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  2. Joseph B. Sprofera v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Pervis McAllister v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API