Albright v. City of South San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GOOD, J.*—
Appellant, a taxpayer in the City of South San Francisco, filed an action to enjoin the city’s practice of paying councilmen and the mayor $50 and $75, respectively, per month as reimbursement for miscellaneous unitemized expenses incurred in the performance of their official duties. These flat sums were paid in addition to any itemized expenses for which individual officers would file particular claims. The flat claims were prepared monthly by the city clerk and signed by the claimants. They were processed, approved and ordered paid as a package along with all other claims…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Taormino v. DennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Porter v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Adams v. City of ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. FielderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Opinion No. (2002), California Attorney General Reports2002
- Opinion No. (2004), California Attorney General Reports2004
- Opinion No. (2005), California Attorney General Reports2005
- Opinion No. (2010), California Attorney General Reports2010
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2021