Legal Opinion

Adams v. City of Modesto

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1901No. Sac. No. 659PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the abatement of a nuisance and for damages, and from an order denying a new trial. The plaintiffs are owners of a tract of land in the city of Modesto, on which, until a short time before the commencement of the suit, they resided with their family. The nuisance complained of is an open wooden trough, passing about three hundred yards from the plaintiff’s house, and constituting part of the sewerage system of the city, through which, for a distance of about four hundred and fifty yards, the sewerage matter of the city is passed.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peterson v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Phillips v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hassell v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Vater v. County of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Dawes v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Johnson v. v. D. Reduction Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API